 |
MROSD “Apartheid” Homelands Vision
1) On November 27, 2002, Mid-Peninsula Regional Open Space District celebrated their 30th anniversary by reaffirming their "anti-Wise Use" Apartheid Vision Into An Open Future. “Thirty years ago there was a vision. It was simple and it was powerful. And it was this: Our natural resources must be protected. This vision grew from an understanding that land, once used for human purposes, can almost never be returned to its natural state. It also understood that we must protect the trees, water, habitat, and species if we are to protect human beings. This vision has had a huge impact. It has changed our community -- forever and permanently. In 30 years the Mid-Peninsula Regional Open Space District has acquired more than 47,000 acres of open space land”. San Mateo County Supervisor Richard Gordon is the Envirocults poster boy and Minister of Propaganda (EMP) for the Committee for Green Envirocults, Da Envirocult aka Sierra Club and Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST aka 5th Column). California history has taught us that these aging Envirocult 5th Columns attracted small flocks of extremist sheeple that are usually mentally unstable, incompetent, and corrupt. These Envirocults 5th Column cartels are destroying California’s economic and watershed natural systems sustainability while depriving Rural Lands families Environmental Justice. Respond to this paragraph content in the Eco-Justice 4 US Public Forum
2) In a May 12, 1973, Da Envirocultist and high priest Olive Mayer proclaimed their apartheid vision in a letter from the Loma Prieta chapter of the Sierra Club to the California Department of Public Works. “Sierra Club believes it is unnecessary to urbanize the mid-coast side of the San Mateo County because county reports indicate that expanding population can easily be accommodated in already existing communities well provided with community services. It is unnecessary to sacrifice a priceless scenic, esthetic, regional , recreational resource to create a new community. According to San Mateo County Planning Department, even with existing access roads limited to two lanes, the coastal population can increase 5,800 to 15,500 people. ABAG has recommended, in its coastal plan, that growth on the mid-coast side be limited by limiting road access as well as the water and sewer systems. The Sierra Club believes that the mid-coast side should be kept as a low density buffer zone between the highly populated counties of San Mateo and San Francisco, and the fragile, precious south coast side with its seals, murries , herons, ducks, coastal dunes, marshes, estuaries, etc. this resource undiminished to our children and to our grandchildren so that they may enjoy the experience that has meant so much to us.” Respond to this paragraph content in the Eco-Justice 4 US Public Forum
3) The Da Enviorcults (aka Sierra Club) and the Committee for Green Envirocults launched a Initiative measure to be submitted directly to the voters of San Mateo County called Coastside Protection Initiative of 1994: “The people of the County of San Mateo ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose of This Measure (4) Reduction of Government Expenditures. To reduce costs to San Mateo County taxpayers of roads, law enforcement, fire protection, and other government services for scattered and remote development in the Rural Lands. Section 2. Findings (3) Development Treats. Pressures for extensive development on the Coastside are severe, especially with the proposed construction of increased water supplies , additional sewage treatment facilities, and larger highways. Development on remote and rugged Rural Lands is often difficult and costly, including to the public. It is frequently beset with unsafe roads, soil instability and fire hazard. The purpose of this initiative is to strengthen and make more specific policies protecting the San Mateo County Coastside, to extend key Coastal protections to the Skyline Area, to reduce hazards to residents from fire, flooding, and other natural disasters, and to give (Urban) voters a voice in decisions affecting the San Mateo County Coastside. Sponsors/Proponents: Lennie Roberts Committee for Green Foothills and Mary Hobbs, Co-Chair, Coast Committee, Sierra Club. Respond to this paragraph content in the Eco-Justice 4 US Public Forum
4) Envirocult leaders understand the Urban-Rural Power Gap well, and some of them act to thwart devolution of power to local communities as testified before Congress in the Battered Communities Report. This statement came from the Sierra Club Chairman Michael McCloskey: “ A new dogma is emerging as a challenge to us. It embodies the proposition that the best way for the public to determine how to manage the interest in the environment is through collaboration among stakeholders, not through normal governmental processes…” aka CRMP. “This idea is strongly advanced in the report of the Western Regional Team of the Natural Resource Task Force of the President’s Council of Sustainable Development (PCSD)…The Clinton Administration endorses the idea too. It sees this idea as an extension of its programs for reinventing government, for decentralization, and place-based management… The Quincy Library Group is often cited as one with the most comprehensive agenda: re-doing the plan for managing the entire national forest. Others include the Applegate Partnership in southern Oregon, the Henry’s Fork Watershed Council in Idaho, and scores of watershed councils in Washington state. Many academics praise them too… A fundamental problem lies in the disparate geographical distribution of constituencies. This redistribution of power is designed to disempower our constituency , which is heavily Urban. Few Urbanites are recognized as stakeholders in communities surrounding national forests. Few of the proposals for stakeholder collaboration
provide any way for distant stakeholders to be effectively represented. While we may have activists in some nearby communities, we don’t have them all in the small towns involved. It is curious that these ideas would have the effect of transferring influence to the very communities where we are least organized and potent. They would maximize the influence of those who are least attracted to the environmental cause and most alienated from it.” Report to the Sierra Club Board of Directors meeting in San Francisco, California on November 18,1995.
Respond to this paragraph content in the Eco-Justice 4 US Public Forum
5) The 2003 California Watershed Posse Living Legacy Program celebrated Martin Luther King’s birthday by launching their “helpRID.US” initiatives for the formation of Rural Incorporated Districts (RID) throughout all rural areas of California . The California Watershed Posse’s first RID will be formed in the unincorporated Rural Lands area of San Mateo County . The RID formation election will be held within the boundaries of the proposed RID in calendar year 2003. The incorporation charter for the RID will embody coordinated resource management and planning of vital Rural Lands area resource infrastructure such as water, sewer, roads, watershed natural systems, parks , and open space. The RID’s land use governing document will be a “RID General Plan” The primary goal of the RID is to secure “local control” of the RID areas in perpetuity while preserving , protecting, and providing sustainability of the quality of life values found in the Rural Lands area of California. CWP, as a 501©3 non-profit CRMP Council, only supports non-apartheid rural eco-justice policies and projects. In keeping with CWP educational mission, we recommend reviewing the teachers tutorial: Cry, the beloved country. And yes Lennie Roberts, it has been done before! Read history of City of Fremont and the man who named Fremont. If Oakhurst can do it, why not SMC Rural Lands? State declares "County of San Mateo is saging"! Sustainable San Mateo County? For further information regarding www.cwposse.org contact: Oscar Braun, Executive Director for Environmental Justice: Oscar@cwposse.org or Voice 650-867-5779
Respond to this paragraph content in the Eco-Justice 4 US Public Forum
6) What is the Bay Area water users “Watershed Vision” of the Hetch Hetchy regional water system? Read the only Public Opinion Survey ever published of Households served by the San Francisco Water Department (SFWD). The Survey was conducted in February, 1994 by the San Francisco Water Department, Public Research Institute, San Francisco Sate University, in cooperation with EDAW, Inc. and Public Affairs Management. “A survey was carried out in order to ascertain public opinion on issues of water quality, goals of watershed management, recreation, recreational access to the watersheds, environmental protection, financing, and other issues related to watershed management. Survey questions were based on SFWD goals for watershed management and on issues and input received from the public and from agencies at all levels of government . The findings of the survey will allow SFWD to take the opinions of its public constituency into account in the planning process.” Compare the public opinion with the Bay Area “Enviro-cults Vision”. Click here to view the entire San Francisco Watershed Management Plans Public Opinion Survey Report. (large pdf, please be patient) 5991954 Respond to this paragraph content in the Eco-Justice 4 US Public Forum
8) The CWP believes an Environmental Justice land use policy that would best enhance individual liberty is one that reverses today’s trend toward nationalization and divest government land ownerships into individual hands, free of easements and other burdens on title. Land ownership is not the only property right. Violated basic civil rights currently include: Water, Grazing, Mining, Timber and Privacy Rights.
9) California’s economic sustainability faces catastrophic risks from being destroyed from within by our Grey Governor and the unconstitutional California Coastal Commi-Czar’s with their “PAY To PLAY” coastal rural land use extortion, bribery, fundraising and eco-terrorist racketeering activities. "The arbitrary way the California Coastal Commission exercises its combination of legislative, executive, and judicial functions and powers serves as the poster boy for abuse of government power," said Pacific Legal Foundation Attorney James Burling. Since 9/11, the California body politic and the state natural resource management institutions have been revealed as unstable, incompetent, corrupt and now unconstitutional. It is time for U.S. Department of Justice intervention and Federal judicial RICO cleansing to begin. It is time to expose these apartheid enemies in our midst and stop them from destroying California's economic vitality and sustainability. It is time for California’s ship of State to change course in the direction of Environmental Justice for all of it's people. The California Watershed Posse is requesting that the U.S. Attorney General impanel a Federal Grand Jury for the purpose of investigating the California Coastal Commission RICO activities.
Alan Beaven was the California Watershed Posse co-founder and Clean Water Act legal counsel. Alan's passion was the protection of California's water quality and the watershed's natural systems. He made the ultimate sacrafice for this, his adopted country, on September 11, 2001 on United Airlines Flight 93. Alan Beaven was one of those heroes that died on 9/11 by fearlessly confonting the evil of terrorism. Alan's love of life, family and community compelled him to do what he had always done…the right thing. The CWP will strive to preserve Alan Beaven's living legacy by protecting California's water quality and rural watershed areas. The CWP will provide the leadership, stewardship services and wildland urban interface (WUI) area security by deploying wireless early detection fire/water/intruder alert sentinel systems.
Public Document Resource Links
California Watershed Posse (CWP) 21st Century Mission Statement
Sierra Club Regional Group 1971 Coastal Rural Lands Vision
Loren McQueen v. Mid-Peninsula Regional Open Space District
2003 San Mateo County Agricultural Summit
Nature’s Landlord, World’s Most Powerful Enviro-Group Exposed
Nature Conservancy, Washington Post’s Insightful “Green” Series
Undue Influence, Ron Arnold
Rural Battered Communities Testimony
5th Column Versus Us
The Real “Monsters of the Coastal Rural Lands”
The Sierra Club $300 Billion Dollar Tunnels Boondoggle
Think Tunnels: Sooner, Safer, Cheaper….Never!!!
Devil’s Slide Tunnels Notice of Violation : Endangered Species Act
Save Devil’s Slide Highway Funding Letter, Sec. Norman Mineta
Devil’s Slide Declared “No Substantial Issues” by CCC
CCC, CGF & Sierra Club “Tunnels Mitigation Scheme” Kills Fed Funding
"Pay to Play" Gov. Davis & Unconstitutional CCC
Sierra Club & Gov. Davis Hetch Hetchy Hidden Agenda
No RICO Government For Us
Parks & Open Space Environmental Data (POSTed)
EPA, U.S. Attorney, IRS, RICO Referral October 2001
CGF & BOS Retaliate and Order Abatement of Rural Land Families
SOB Supports Raymond Levine Rural Lands Home Project
Final Notice of Violation BOS Jerry Hill re: POST Landfill et all.
War Declared on Open Space off-roaders
Golden Gate National Recreation Area Reactive Maintenance Report
Cutting Green Tape: Toxic Pollutants, Environmental Regulations & Law
Wise Use Versus "Smart Growth" Essay
San Mateo Agricultural Summit Keynote Presentation, Steve Oku
Why the Peninsula Agriculture lands keeps disappearing!
Sign the “No MROSD Coastal Annexation Petition”
Ron Sturgeon Comments re: MROSD EIR
La Honda-Pescadero School District Comments re: MROSD Draft EIR
San Mateo County Association of Realtors Comments MROSD Draft EIR
La Honda Fire Brigade Inc. Comments regarding MROSD Draft EIR
Mary Clayton, Co-chair Coastal Family Alliance re: MROSD annexation
Carol Simon, Comments re: MROSD Draft EIR
Petrea Hamor, Comments re: MROSD Draft EIR
No MROSD Annexation Op/Ed Letter by Deborah Ettinger
Anti-MROSD Annexation Op/Ed Letter by Susan True
Andy Braun, Comments & Questions re: MROSD Draft EIR
Oscar Braun, July 2002, Comments & Question MROSD Draft EIR
John Donovan, Consensus re: Butano Creek Enhancement Project
CWP Fire Safe Council Offers Sponsorship for Butano Creek Project
CWP Fire Safe & CRMP Council Follow-up letter to PMAC
Just Ask Your Neighbor About the San Mateo County RCD.
CWP Water Quality Testing Studies
CWP Proposed Confined Animal Ordinance
CWP Opposes Access into SFPUC Watershed Sensitive Habitat Areas
Fire Prevention Grant Proposal: Ambient FireAlert Sentinel System
Fire Prevention Grant Proposal: S.F. Peninsula Regional EIR Template
LAFCo Regulations
San Mateo County 2002 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
California Coastal Act
San Mateo County General Plan
San Mateo County Local Coastal Plan
San Mateo County Environmental Services, Documents, Maps & Figures
1994 San Francisco Public Opinion on Watershed Management Issues
California Watershed Posse Water Quality Protection Program
California Rangeland Water Quality Management Plan
Council on Environmental Quality
The Wildland Project
Healthy Forest Initiative
CWP San Francisco Peninsula Watershed Security Plan 2001
California CRMP Council A Local Approach
California Watershed Posse (CWP) CRMP Council Services
California Watershed Posse Fire Safe Council
California Fire Plan
CDF Monitoring Study Group Monitoring Program
Environmental Justice Presidential Order
National Invasive Species Management Plan
Endangered Species Act
Clean Water Act
Ecosystems Management , Techniques and Implementation
Creative Solutions in Regional Conservation Planning by E & P System
Ambient Control Sentinel Systems
Study of Wildland Fire Suppression Cost
Meeting the challenges of Homeland Security in the SF Bay Area
|